This Parle Digestive Marie Biscuit ad which was launched in 2013 is set
in an office; a male employee is shown with a pack of digestive biscuits
(without any brand) on his desk which he is supposed to be eating. His boss
comes into the scene and asks him as to why is he eating it, the employee
replies that it is tasty, in response the boss taunts him and tempts him with
various other tasty snacks like samosas, pizza and cream cake. This is followed
by
an explanation by the boss as to why the ‘tasty’ digestive biscuits are actually not good for health, the reason being they contain high amount of fat to make them tasty. The ad then recommends Parle Digestive Marie Biscuit which is low in fat and high in fibre, therefore better for health; at the end the employee adds, rather reluctantly, that it is tasty as well.
an explanation by the boss as to why the ‘tasty’ digestive biscuits are actually not good for health, the reason being they contain high amount of fat to make them tasty. The ad then recommends Parle Digestive Marie Biscuit which is low in fat and high in fibre, therefore better for health; at the end the employee adds, rather reluctantly, that it is tasty as well.
A few questions
came to my mind after seeing this ad a few times – On what consumer insights is
this ad based on? What distinctive competitive offer is the ad making to the
target consumers? Why have they picked on digestive biscuits?
The ad aims to
be educative; it informs consumers that digestive biscuits are tasty because of
their high fat content which is unhealthy. The ad attacks the generally
accepted belief that digestive biscuits are healthy. In the earlier ads of
Parle Digestive Marie Biscuit, it was pitched against junk food (Chaatwala ad)
and there was another one which was pitched against ‘sadharan’ or ‘ordinary’ Marie
biscuits (Thief ad). It seems Parle is attacking a different biscuit category
in each of its campaigns.
Throughout the
length of the ad the message conveyed to the consumers is that Parle Digestive
Marie Biscuit should be consumed for its health benefits – taste is not really
its strong point, if you are looking for taste there are other options, but they
are bad for health. In short the final impression one gets after seeing the ad
is that Parle Digestive Marie Biscuit is healthy but not tasty enough. Towards the
end of the ad the employee does utter in a low voice that it is tasty, but his
expression, voice and body language do not sound convincing; it seems he is
saying it only to please his boss.
The ad would
have been far more effective had they shown the employee’s expression
and body language undergoing a change after he tries out Parle Digestive Marie
Biscuit. Some kind of delight or joy should have been shown in the expression of the employee and he
should enthusiastically endorse both the health and taste of Parle
Digestive Marie together with his boss. An ad like this must show some
change for the better; the product must make a difference if it really
has a competitive advantage otherwise the ad is no better than a dry
lecture. Well, that's in my opinion.
No comments:
Post a Comment